Dishing the dirt: is modern archaeology just garbage?

Chris Sinkinson  |  Features  |  defending our faith
Date posted:  1 Apr 2020
Share Add       
Dishing the dirt: is modern  archaeology just garbage?

The site at Abel Beth Maacah | photo: YouTube

Archaeology is rubbish. Or at least that’s the title of an archaeological guidebook written by Tony Robinson. It is a reference to the fact that archaeology generally deals in the material that got lost, broken and left behind.

That is the crucial reason why the further we go back in history the less substantial remains are found for the people, places and events that we might find written about in literature. The Bible is overflowing with information about the ancient history of the Israelites and God’s dealings with them. It is therefore, all the more remarkable how much rubbish and debris has been found that does help to confirm that this is reliable history.

However, it should not surprise us that there are many gaps in the archaeological record. In this column we often draw attention to headline discoveries: King David’s name on the Tel Dan stela; a recent gateway from the time of King David; seals bearing the names of Hezekiah and Isaiah. But, the critics can always point to something else for which we don’t have direct unambiguous archaeological confirmation – King Saul, Gideon or Moses.

Share
< Previous article| Features| Next article >
Read more articles by Chris Sinkinson >>
Features
Migration – lessons ancient and modern

Migration – lessons ancient and modern

I’m writing this from the island of Crete where I am filming with the Christian Television Association. It’s a land …

Features
In the footsteps of David

In the footsteps of David

Generally, the further back in time the harder it is to prove that something has happened. We regularly report in …

New here?

Register and get three free articles each month!

Register

About en

Our vision, values and history

Read more