Can all the king's horses and all the king's men put evangelicalism back together again?

Josh Moody  |  Features  |  Letter from America
Date posted:  1 Nov 2001
Share Add       

'When I use a word it means what I choose it to mean - neither more nor less'. So said Humpty Dumpty in Lewis Caroll's Alice Through The Looking Glass. These days the word 'evangelical' seems to be used in that kind of Humpty Dumpty way. Evangelicalism as a concept is increasingly flexible.

Some therefore wonder whether it should be disbanded altogether. If groups with very diverse theological convictions, and some with very few theological convictions, all feel they can gather under the banner of 'evangelical' is the term in any sense still useful?

In America, the evangelical community is so large, so diverse, so disparate, that it's easy to wonder whether the word 'evangelical' means anything at all. Increasingly neo-orthodoxy by the back door (a latent universalism, a subjectivisation of the authority of Scripture, a tendency to squeeze all of Christian doctrine through a mesh of what is 'loving', with the notion of 'love' being secularly not biblical defined) is infiltrating evangelicalism. And even when genuinely orthodox evangelicalism here has become tarnished by being vigorously sold as a marketing product.

Share
< Previous article| Features| Next article >
Read more articles by Josh Moody >>
World
Are we still ‘evangelical’? If so, why?

Are we still ‘evangelical’? If so, why?

What does it mean to be an ‘evangelical’? In some ways this is a perennial question but recent developments in …

World
Christian political thought in a tense US election year

Christian political thought in a tense US election year

I was recently browsing through (again) Oliver and Joan O’Donovan’s peerless From Irenaeus to Grotius: A Sourcebook in Christian Political …

Give a subscription

🎁 Get 20% off a subscription for a friend this Christmas!

Tell me more

Subscribe

Enjoy our monthly paper and full online access

Find out more